DraftScience re. more proof against the kinetic energy formula
Published at : September 13, 2021
email: ds@donotgo.com
Kinetic energy facts
The kinetic energy Theory has a very unscientific history. It originated as a protest against "physics becoming to atheistic" and to satisfy a desire that science complement religion.
The evidence supporting the kinetic energy Theory is weak to non-existent. The clay experiments of the 1700s we're obviously dubious as a scientific proof. There have been no modern experiments proving the existence of any energy Beyond momentum.
The formula creates free energy paradoxes
The formula clearly challenges the validity of Newton's third law.
The formula is not a rational derivative of Newton's mechanics
Single slit facts
1. The single slit math models two vectors with Point sources at the surfaces. -- That is, the math models two diffracting "waves" with their centers at the surfaces.
2. The math predicts/models a result on a curved surface of radius L (target distance).
3. The number of possible nodes/locations of constructive or destructive interference is defined by how many wavelengths of the light fit in the distance between the surfaces. ... Dividing the wavelength into the distance between the surfaces will tell you exactly how many on/off nodes will be projected onto the curved surface.
4. The "path length difference" at 90° is the total distance between the surfaces and dictates what the node at 0° will be.
5. The equidistant vectors pointing to the center do not create real nodes as they only span a tiny distance (the distance between two surfaces) at the Target. Real vectors move in the same left/right direction.
7. The double slit experiment is just two single slit experiment superimposed on top of each other. Not to single slits of the same dimensions, but rather a composite product of a single slit with the dimensions of the center impediment and a single slit with the dimensions of the outside surfaces. ... The double slit is combining two, two Source, experiments... Where the four sources are in phase there is construction of a photon... When all four sources are not in phase no photon is recorded.
What Is Energy? ...The sensible answer: https://youtu.be/zAMQELz-0WI
What Is Gravity? ...The sensible answer: https://youtu.be/crH5qZ_4Ns0
What Is A Photon? ...The sensible answer: https://youtu.be/GWbUgitFiJk
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
""If I'm in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isn't this proof against the kinetic energy formula?""
""Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much "energy" as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why? ""
""If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?""
""Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy--ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
subjects: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1kwTLU_06dVVOu8eyCsR9TH5EbWnqRbG
All Playlists: https://www.youtube.com/user/DraftScience/playlists
Start here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1kwTLU_06dXj6m1glj4Anx2o0KCHZkSw
Questions Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1kwTLU_06dV1KR9JHXZj9WbB-DzLt-Qn
http://draftphysics.com/
http://donotgo.com/in/ds/index.html
Kinetic energy facts
The kinetic energy Theory has a very unscientific history. It originated as a protest against "physics becoming to atheistic" and to satisfy a desire that science complement religion.
The evidence supporting the kinetic energy Theory is weak to non-existent. The clay experiments of the 1700s we're obviously dubious as a scientific proof. There have been no modern experiments proving the existence of any energy Beyond momentum.
The formula creates free energy paradoxes
The formula clearly challenges the validity of Newton's third law.
The formula is not a rational derivative of Newton's mechanics
Single slit facts
1. The single slit math models two vectors with Point sources at the surfaces. -- That is, the math models two diffracting "waves" with their centers at the surfaces.
2. The math predicts/models a result on a curved surface of radius L (target distance).
3. The number of possible nodes/locations of constructive or destructive interference is defined by how many wavelengths of the light fit in the distance between the surfaces. ... Dividing the wavelength into the distance between the surfaces will tell you exactly how many on/off nodes will be projected onto the curved surface.
4. The "path length difference" at 90° is the total distance between the surfaces and dictates what the node at 0° will be.
5. The equidistant vectors pointing to the center do not create real nodes as they only span a tiny distance (the distance between two surfaces) at the Target. Real vectors move in the same left/right direction.
7. The double slit experiment is just two single slit experiment superimposed on top of each other. Not to single slits of the same dimensions, but rather a composite product of a single slit with the dimensions of the center impediment and a single slit with the dimensions of the outside surfaces. ... The double slit is combining two, two Source, experiments... Where the four sources are in phase there is construction of a photon... When all four sources are not in phase no photon is recorded.
What Is Energy? ...The sensible answer: https://youtu.be/zAMQELz-0WI
What Is Gravity? ...The sensible answer: https://youtu.be/crH5qZ_4Ns0
What Is A Photon? ...The sensible answer: https://youtu.be/GWbUgitFiJk
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
""If I'm in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isn't this proof against the kinetic energy formula?""
""Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much "energy" as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why? ""
""If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?""
""Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy--ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
subjects: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1kwTLU_06dVVOu8eyCsR9TH5EbWnqRbG
All Playlists: https://www.youtube.com/user/DraftScience/playlists
Start here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1kwTLU_06dXj6m1glj4Anx2o0KCHZkSw
Questions Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1kwTLU_06dV1KR9JHXZj9WbB-DzLt-Qn
http://draftphysics.com/
http://donotgo.com/in/ds/index.html
lightspeedatom